The geographical variability, frequency content, and vertical structure of near-surface oceanic kinetic energy (KE) are important for air-sea interaction, marine ecosystems, operational oceanography, pollutant tracking, and interpreting remotely sensed velocity measurements. Here, KE in high-resolution global simulations (HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model; HYCOM, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model; MITgcm), at the sea surface (0 m) and 15 m, are respectively compared with KE from undrogued and drogued surface drifters. Global maps and zonal averages are computed
for low-frequency (periods longer than 2 days), near-inertial, diurnal, and semi-diurnal bands. In the low-frequency band, near the equator, both models exhibit KE values that are too low relative to drifters. MITgcm near-inertial KE is too low, while HYCOM nearinertial KE lies closer to drifter KE, probably due to more frequently updated atmospheric forcing. In the semi-diurnal band, MITgcm KE is too high, while HYCOM lies closer to drifters, likely due to the inclusion of a parameterized topographic internal wave drag. We assess the KE vertical structure by considering the ratio of zonally averaged KE in 0 m/15 m model results and undrogued/drogued drifter results. Over most latitudes and frequency bands, model ratios track the drifter ratio to within error bars. All frequency bands except the semi-diurnal band display measurable vertical structure. Latitudinal dependence in the vertical structure is greatest in the diurnal and low-frequency bands. As in a previous comparison of HYCOM and MITgcm to current meter observations, HYCOM generally displays larger spatial correlations with the drifter observations than MITgcm does.